During review phase, “assignee” is the person who opened the PR; later on if PR is picked up by other developer, a new “assignee” is added. Once PR is approved and ready for QA or direct merge, a new QA “assignee” is added. If your code is having only one version in production at all times (i.e. web sites, web services, etc) you may use github-flow. Main reason is that you don’t need to complex things for the developer. Once developer finish a feature or finish a bugfix its immediately promoted to production version. For me, I had set up my remote repository with an SSH key, but Git could not find them because the HOMEDRIVE environment variable was automatically getting set to a network share due to my company’s domain policy.
Once feature is done we merge it back to master branch. There is a subtle difference in terms of conflict management. In case of conflicts, a pull request in Github will result in a merge commit on the destination branch. In Gitlab, when a conflict is found, the modifications made will be on a merge commit on the source branch. You might get prompted for username/password once on git clone . Add your username, and PAT (not your account password!) into the forms, when asked.
Job failed with exit status 1 without any error
Storage limits still apply and for some projects it is fine. After generating a new token on Gitlab, I tried to commit the code with VS Code. The second time I received the popup below asking for user name (which is the token name) and password (which is the token). If you are using VS Code for the first time, you may have to try to clone a repo twice in order to get the popup below. I found that I was able to solve this by signing out of GitHub then signing back in.
What are the differences in using GitHub or GitLab for CI/CD?
I had to Used this command git branch -m old branch name new branch name. I was deleting the remote branch in Gitlab via GUI and that was not helping.I tried deleting the remote branch by git on command line and it worked. If you are not prompted for your username and password, your credentials may be cached on your computer.
- There might be tools for merging issues and MR from multiple repositories but would that be a worthy time investment?
- Open the project in VS Code and click Synchronize changes.
- You might get prompted for username/password once on git clone .
- There is at least one GUI that supports git-flow for Mac and Windows SourceTree.
How can I add an SSH key to a GitHub account?
Only in general, make sure that it is indeed using that deploy key when doing git operations. There should be a private part of the key configured somewhere. Ultimately, the choice between GitHub and GitLab depends on your specific project requirements, team preferences, and whether you value features like self-hosting, integrated CI/CD, and a unified platform. Evaluate your needs carefully and consider experimenting with both platforms to determine which aligns best with your workflow and objectives. When I do this I get errors of pre-recive hooks rejecting the deletion of protected branches. GitHub Actions – simple CI; GitLab CI/CD – configurable and powerful open-source CI/CD with integrations with different software and unique features.
- When Alice wants to “merge” her changes into B, she actually wants Bob to “pull” these changes from A.
- If you are using VS Code for the first time, you may have to try to clone a repo twice in order to get the popup below.
- Right now I’m thinking releases would be duplicated to GitHub and code only in GitLab.
- On Windows, it should work by setting this to the wincred credential helper.
Auth in browser with Visual Studio Code.
It is actually meant to be used with issues rather than pull request so that when we receive a issue we can assign someone to fix it. In a pull request, an assignee refers to a person who’s in charge of merging that pull request after getting comments and change requests from other maintainers. As for applications which can be released out to the world (e.g. mobile or desktop apps) my understanding is that they propose to use different model by using release branches instead of environment branches. We still do all work in feature branches and merge them back to master branch upon completion. Then when we make sure that master branch is stable enough i.e. we have already performed all testing and bug-fixing we create release branch and release our software. If there is a critical issue we first fix it in master branch and cherry-pick a fix to release branch.
Projects one writes would be more visible and can potentially be seen by more users / developers too. GitLab runner is running under a dedicated user gitlab-runner if you are using shell executor. Make sure, that user has the same environment as your user. Or try to run the command under gitlab-runner user and see if it works. I had to Used this command git branch -m old branch name new branch name . In terminal its showing correct but its not updated in browser.
On GitHub, what’s the difference between reviewer and assignee?
There is at least one GUI that supports git-flow for Mac and Windows SourceTree. It works well when you have an application that have a slow development/deployment flow. Start with a model as simple as possible (like GitHub flow tends to be), and move towards a more complex model if you need to. Some of the respondents indicated that they use git-flow in general. We need to configure VS Code to provide authentication on top of Git commands. In my case I was using a Bitbucket app password and it always asked me to authenticate.
Answers
They are useful tools for code review and change management. GitHub now requires fine-grained personal access tokens (PATs) for most new workflows. Classic tokens still work if you already created them, but new tokens should be generated as fine-grained for better security. Obviously coding counts, but should reviewing be considered work as well?
The link also highlights that Git will use the Windows Credential Manager by default. Seems that this setting is not configured in your Git client (anymore?). As the commenter said above, it’s basically just each company’s answer to CI/CD.
If there is a critical issue we fix it in feature or master branch and then merge it to environment branches. In GitHub a reviewer is a person who reviews the pull request. A project owner can request review from any of the maintainers, They can even set an option so that the pull request can be merged only if it is reviewed by one of the maintainer with write access. GitHub Flow as originally depicted by Scott Chacon in 2011 assumed each change once reviewed on a feature branch and merged into master should be deployed to production immediately. Deploying from the feature branch makes perfect sense as in the case of any issue production can be instantaneously reverted by deploying master to it. Please take a look at a short visual introduction to GitHub Flow.
Merge or pull requests are created in a git management application and ask an assigned person to merge two branches. Tools such as GitHub and Bitbucket choose the name pull request since the first manual action would be to pull the feature branch. Tools such as GitLab and Gitorious choose the https://traderoom.info/gitlab-vs-github/ name merge request since that is the final action that is requested of the assignee.
After fighting with something like this for a little while, I think I came up with a good solution, especially when having multiple accounts across both GitHub and Bitbucket. However for Visual Studio Code, it ultimately ended up as start it from a Git Bash terminal so that it inherited the environment variables from the bash session and it knew which ssh-agent to look at. The updated part at the end of this answer doesn’t really help you at all. (It actually makes you stagnant in your workflow.) It only stops things happening in Visual Studio Code and moves these happenings to the terminal. According to StackOverflow’s 2022 developer survey GitHub was the most popular choice among developers both for personal and processional use. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.